Boss BF-2 Flanger Mod

Izrada, održavanje, saveti...

Moderators: dejankuki, Trooper, Nedalm

Post Reply
User avatar
ripkid
Posts: 79
Joined: 11 Jan 2009, 17:46

Boss BF-2 Flanger Mod

Post by ripkid » 17 Feb 2012, 22:07

Pozdrav,interesuje me da li je neko mozda radio do sada mod ove pedale i kako je zadovoljan ? Da li je razlika velika izmedju originalne i mod varijante ?
Znam da se neki ljudi ovde sa foruma bave izmedju ostalog i modovanjem pa bi me zanimalo i njihovo misljenje u vezi ovoga.
Gledao sam nesto po netu i svideo mi se mod koji rade ovi francuzi http://www.msmworkshop.fr/ demo pedale : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XoyjoZAY ... ature=plcp

Fazon je da u principu pedala zvuci toplije,da nema volume boost i taj metalski zvuk kada se otpanji RES pot.

Takodje video sam i da BF-2 moze da se moduje u HF-2 (Hi Band Flanger),potrebno je valjda samo zameniti neki BBD chip sa MN3204 chipom no to vi ovde bolje znate,zainteresovan sam u principu i za mod te vrste jer se generalno HF-2 dosta dobro pokazao u radu sa overdrive/dist. a ja planiram da ga upravo koristim u toj kombinaciji za razliku od clean varijante.

Misljenja ?

User avatar
ripkid
Posts: 79
Joined: 11 Jan 2009, 17:46

Re: Boss BF-2 Flanger Mod

Post by ripkid » 18 Feb 2012, 16:35

Neko ?

User avatar
xspaceman
Posts: 1907
Joined: 08 Sep 2008, 16:44
Location: Zrenjanin

Re: Boss BF-2 Flanger Mod

Post by xspaceman » 18 Feb 2012, 17:04

a da prodas taj flendžer i uzmes neki drugi koji ti vise odgovara?

User avatar
ripkid
Posts: 79
Joined: 11 Jan 2009, 17:46

Re: Boss BF-2 Flanger Mod

Post by ripkid » 18 Feb 2012, 17:19

Zasto bih uzimao novi ako ovaj mogu da modujem i da zvuci pristojno :) Inace flangeri koji kao vaze za najbolje tipa MXR flanger ili Electric Mistress su mi precenjeni za ono sto nude u zvuku,licno moje misljenje.

Funkomat
MF veteran
Posts: 7846
Joined: 22 Aug 2006, 21:47
Location: Novi Sad
Contact:

Re: Boss BF-2 Flanger Mod

Post by Funkomat » 18 Feb 2012, 17:25

xspaceman wrote:a da prodas taj flendžer i uzmes neki drugi koji ti vise odgovara?
:1:
Uvek bolja varijanta sa pedalama.

Image

User avatar
ripkid
Posts: 79
Joined: 11 Jan 2009, 17:46

Re: Boss BF-2 Flanger Mod

Post by ripkid » 18 Feb 2012, 17:35

Imao sam u vidu i taj Ibanez FL-9 flanger ali ne bih uzimao nista novo a i malo mi je tanak u zvuku.

User avatar
xspaceman
Posts: 1907
Joined: 08 Sep 2008, 16:44
Location: Zrenjanin

Re: Boss BF-2 Flanger Mod

Post by xspaceman » 18 Feb 2012, 17:40

ripkid wrote:Imao sam u vidu i taj Ibanez FL-9 flanger ali ne bih uzimao nista novo a i malo mi je tanak u zvuku.
pa cimni nekog od graditelja pedala sa foruma da ti moduje tog bossa, ili pogledaj po oglasima...na kp se uvek moze naci neki vintage polovni flanger(sad ih ima bar 2 komada+jedan odlican klon ehx electric mistressa)...inace imao sam i ja vintage fl9...radi za medalju!

Funkomat
MF veteran
Posts: 7846
Joined: 22 Aug 2006, 21:47
Location: Novi Sad
Contact:

Re: Boss BF-2 Flanger Mod

Post by Funkomat » 18 Feb 2012, 17:40

Naidje po oglasima i za mene je on izvanredan. Daleko daleko bolji od Bf-a.
Sve preporuke.

Funkomat
MF veteran
Posts: 7846
Joined: 22 Aug 2006, 21:47
Location: Novi Sad
Contact:

Re: Boss BF-2 Flanger Mod

Post by Funkomat » 18 Feb 2012, 17:41

Pretece me kolega.

User avatar
Rocket Roll
Posts: 7274
Joined: 09 Jul 2006, 00:47
Location: Beograd
Contact:

Re: Boss BF-2 Flanger Mod

Post by Rocket Roll » 18 Feb 2012, 19:34

To što hoćeš može da se izvede, ali nepraktično je iz više razloga. BF-2 je napravljen da bi gitarista imao ovaj legendarni zvuk uvek na raspolaganju:



I to je ono što on odlično radi. I veoma je tražen zbog toga. Kada se pojavio, izazvao je pravu revoluciju. Prerađivati ga u nešto drugo pomalo nalikuje pretvaranju bolida u pekarski kamion - može da se izvede, ali bolje ti je da imaš baš-baš dobar razlog za to.

Dalje, flendžeri su nezgodni za igranje, jer ako poremetiš bias BBD čipa ne možeš da ga rekalibrišeš bez pomoći nekog ko ima osciloskop i signal generator, zna da ih koristi, i pritom razume kako radi BBD čip. Takvi su, na žalost, retki, mada to nije neko space shuttle znanje. (To znači da zamena MN3207 sa MN3204 automatski otpada - u pitanju je ekstenzivna modifikacija koja u svakom slučaju traži rekalibraciju.)

Treće, sve promene na 9V flendžerima su, ipak, suptilne. Osnovno ograničenje im ostaje činjenica da rade na samo 9V i da im je stoga headroom mali. Čim im ubaciš malo jači signal - okineš žice muški - odmah kreću da "metaliziraju", pa da su ne znam kako modovane. To je zato što taj "metalni" zvuk ne dolazi samo od tonske sekcije, nego od overdrajvovane BBD linije. A da bi se to izbeglo, radna voltaža treba da bude barem 15V, kako je slučaj sa EHX Electric Mistress.

Modifikacije koje bi mogle da pomognu slede. Ako ti treba objašnjenje za neku od njih, pitaj. Imaj u vidu da ih lično nisam isprobao:

Code: Select all

a) C27 and C28 make up a non-polarized 16.5uf capacitor which sets the speed range. If the capacitance value is reduced, the speed range goes higher. Faster speed can produce an effect that sounds very much like a ring modulator. I would suggest a pair of 4.7uf caps, back to back, as a suitable replacement.

b) Maximum flanging effect needs a 50/50 balance between delay and clean signal, but sometimes you want just a taste of flanging. If the value of R29 is increased, the balance is shifted in favour of clean. If you replaced R29 with a 22k fixed resistor, and a 100k pot, wired as a variable resistor (2 lugs, not all 3), you would be able to get everything from a *perfect* 50/50 balance to a much softer flanging effect, even with very high regen/res.

c) R11, D3, and D4 form a soft limiter, to keep high regeneration/resonance signals from overloading the delay chip. If you shunt/short R11, the clipping of D3/D4 becomes "harder" and introduces more harmonic content. If you want to experiment with more interesting high regeneration signals, solder in a wire bridge across R11 on the copper side of the PCB, turn up VR5 a bit higher (VR5 is normally set so that turning up the RES control all the way puts you just below the point of oscillation).

d) C7 sets the lower bandwidth point (bass rolloff) of the regeneration signal. If you make it smaller in value, this will make high regen/res settings sound less metallic. A value of .01uf might be a good place to start.

e) The depth contol (VR2) adjusts the balance of voltages coming from the LFO and the Manual control to drive the clock (IC4). VR7 is used to adjust or fine tune the delay time by adding (or maybe subtracting) a small DC voltage on top of whatever comes through VR2/R48. C30 sets the delay range of the clock circuit. Values larger than 47pf will set the minimum delay time much longer. Smaller values will reduce the minimum delay time. You can change the sound of the pedal by changing the range of delays it can produce. Try a cap of 39pf and see if you like it. If there are problems with the sweep, you may be able to fix them with VR7. Alternatively, if you are able to find an MN3209 chip somewhere, you can take the MN3207 out and replace it with the MN3209 for shorter (X/4) delay times and more of a "jet plane" sound.

f) Vibrato is created when you use ONLY the delay signal, and leave out the clean signal. If you lift one end of R28, that will prevent the clean signal from being mixed in with the delay signal, and give vibrato. Unfortunately, because of how bypass is done in this pedal, this means that when you try to bypass the pedal, there will be NO sound coming out.
Solution: In modulation effects where dry and wet are combined, you can cancel the effect bi simply lifting the connection between the wet path and mixing stage. In the BF2, Q4 fulfills this function.

This means that while the "flip" part of the circuit is used to enable/disable the gate of a FET and an LED, the "flop" part of the circuit does nothing. We *can* put this section to work, though.

To produce vibrato, lifting one end of R28 will kill the dry signal and get you vibrato. When you hit the footswitch, though, there is no "flop" action to restore the bypassed/clean signal....but there COULD be..

Imagine that there is a second 47k resistor and a FET in series with each other, and in parallel with R28. Now, also imagine that there is a 1M resistor, .047uf cap, and diode connecting the gate of that FET to the junction of R55 and Q9, exactly the same way a resistor, cap, diode combo connects the gate of Q4 to the junction of R56/Q10. Step on the footswithc once, and the led comes on and Q4 goes low resistance. Step again and Q4 and the LED go off and our new added FET turns on and provides a low resistance path for the clean signal to the added parallel resistor and the mixing stage. More importantly for our purposes, that path exists independent of the toggle switch. So, if the toggle is closed, the added FET/resistor simply duplicate what is already there when you step on the footswitch. If the toggle is open, then cancelling the wet signal also results in providing a dry signal.

FYI, the C7, C21 mods have no effect at all when the res/regen is off.
I suggest you look at the BF-2B which does have less metalic sound. Roughly,
- a delay chip with less (512) stages. this reduces the delay time
- C7 mod (47nF to 10nF)
- C6 is reduced from 47nF to 15nF.
Now reducing the delay time can significantly reduce the metalicness. One way to approximate this is to reduce C30 (47pF). Unfortunately the clock frequencies are already pretty high so it's probably unwise to use a small C30 like 22pF to drop the delay to the BF-2B level. You could try 33pF and cross your fingers.
Tune the C6 mod first to your taste with res/regen off - try say 22nF or 33nF.
Then Tune C7 using some res/regen.
Another mod is to play with C8 and C9. For example you can get the filters to be quite close to the mxr flanger by changing only two caps: C8 from 12nF to 2.2nF, and change C9 from 150pF to 1nF.

In case you are still interested in attemping the mod on the BF-2, I studied the schematic available from the Free Information Society and came to the following changes in order to achieve the increased sweep after replacing the BBD for a 512 stage MN3204:
1) IC5 needs to be replaced with a full rail-to-rail output opamp like the TLC2262, TLC2272 or MAX492, to name some.
2) Then, resistors R36 (180k) and R37 (220k) need to be swapped with each other to increase the output voltage range of the LFO.
The use of a rail-to-rail output opamp is necessary, otherwise the LFO won't work with the extended output voltage range. Eventually, but not necessarily, VR7 might need a slight adjustment in order to center the new range of the sweep.
In summary, the required changes are pretty simple, except for the difficulty in getting the MN3204 and TLC2262 ICs (WHICH YOU HAVE ALREADY DONE!)

progg
Posts: 259
Joined: 07 Feb 2009, 18:22
Location: Nis

Re: Boss BF-2 Flanger Mod

Post by progg » 18 Feb 2012, 19:46

I ja bih ti savetovao promenu flangera. Jbg, izabrao si analogni flanger sa maximalnim "metalnim prizvukom" (imao sam bf-2, probao ga i jedino mi je legao na clean-u). S druge strane MXR stereo flanger sa adapterom na 18v razvaljuje i na clean-u i na drive/dist. Imao sam i njega neko vreme dok se nisam skrasio sa MXR micro flanger-om. To je jedini zvuk flangera koji meni odgovara (a jako se razlikuje od vecec brata, bf-2 i fl9).

User avatar
ripkid
Posts: 79
Joined: 11 Jan 2009, 17:46

Re: Boss BF-2 Flanger Mod

Post by ripkid » 18 Feb 2012, 19:56

Hvala Rocket na iscrpnom odgovoru druze,a i ostalima na savetu.Nista onda cu da se resim ovog BF-2 a inace u medjuvremenu sam pazario Yamaha FL-10MII analogni flanger u mint stanju,po onome sto sam cuo i procitao deluje i radi fantasticno,stize mi pocetkom nedelje pa cu da ostavim utiske ;)

User avatar
xspaceman
Posts: 1907
Joined: 08 Sep 2008, 16:44
Location: Zrenjanin

Re: Boss BF-2 Flanger Mod

Post by xspaceman » 18 Feb 2012, 19:58

ripkid wrote:Hvala Rocket na iscrpnom odgovoru druze,a i ostalima na savetu.Nista onda cu da se resim ovog BF-2 a inace u medjuvremenu sam pazario Yamaha FL-10MII analogni flanger u mint stanju,po onome sto sam cuo i procitao deluje i radi fantasticno,stize mi pocetkom nedelje pa cu da ostavim utiske ;)
eto...a mogao si odma da me poslusas! ;) :ziveli:

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest